| dbo:description
|
- פסק דין של בית המשפט העליון בארצות הברית, בנוגע לגישה לאמצעים למניעת היריון (iw)
- Yhdysvaltain korkeimman oikeuden päätös vuodelta 1965 (fi)
- bedeutendes Grundsatzurteil des Obersten Gerichtshofs der Vereinigten Staaten (de)
- 1965 U.S. Supreme Court case about access to contraception (en)
|
| dbo:thumbnail
| |
| dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
| dbp:arguedatea
|
- 0001-03-29 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:arguedateb
| |
| dbp:argueyear
| |
| dbp:case
|
- Griswold v. Connecticut, (en)
|
| dbp:concurrence
|
- White (en)
- Goldberg (en)
- Harlan (en)
|
| dbp:cornell
| |
| dbp:courtlistener
| |
| dbp:decidedate
|
- 0001-06-07 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:decideyear
| |
| dbp:dissent
| |
| dbp:findlaw
| |
| dbp:fullname
|
- Estelle T. Griswold and C. Lee Buxton v. Connecticut (en)
|
| dbp:googlescholar
| |
| dbp:holding
|
- The Connecticut statute forbidding use of contraceptives violates the right of marital privacy which is within the penumbra of specific guarantees of the Bill of Rights. Connecticut Supreme Court reversed. (en)
|
| dbp:joinconcurrence
| |
| dbp:joindissent
| |
| dbp:joinmajority
|
- Warren, Clark, Brennan, Goldberg (en)
|
| dbp:justia
| |
| dbp:lawsapplied
|
- U.S. Const. amends. I, III, IV, V, IX, XIV; Conn. Gen. Stat. §§ 53-32, 54-196 (en)
|
| dbp:litigants
|
- Griswold v. Connecticut (en)
|
| dbp:loc
| |
| dbp:majority
| |
| dbp:oralargument
| |
| dbp:oyez
| |
| dbp:parallelcitations
| |
| dbp:prior
| |
| dbp:source
|
- Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. at 484–85 . (en)
- Griswold, 381 U.S. at 485–86. (en)
|
| dbp:subsequent
| |
| dbp:text
|
- Would we allow the police to search the sacred precincts of marital bedrooms for telltale signs of the use of contraceptives? The very idea is repulsive to the notions of privacy surrounding the marriage relationship.
We deal with a right of privacy older than the Bill of Rights – older than our political parties, older than our school system. Marriage is a coming together for better or for worse, hopefully enduring, and intimate to the degree of being sacred. It is an association that promotes a way of life, not causes; a harmony in living, not political faiths; a bilateral loyalty, not commercial or social projects. Yet it is an association for as noble a purpose as any involved in our prior decisions. (en)
- The foregoing cases suggest that specific guarantees in the Bill of Rights have penumbras, formed by emanations from those guarantees that help give them life and substance. Various guarantees create zones of privacy.
...
We have had many controversies over these penumbral rights of "privacy and repose." These cases bear witness that the right of privacy which presses for recognition here is a legitimate one. (en)
|
| dbp:uspage
| |
| dbp:usvol
| |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| dct:subject
| |
| rdf:type
| |
| rdfs:label
|
- Griswold v. Connecticut (en)
- Griswold v. Connecticut (de)
- Griswold v. Connecticut (fr)
- Griswold v. Connecticut (nl)
- 그리월드 대 코네티컷 사건 (ko)
- Caso Griswold v. Connecticut (pt)
- 格里斯沃爾德訴康乃狄克州案 (zh)
|
| owl:differentFrom
| |
| owl:sameAs
| |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
| foaf:depiction
| |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
| foaf:name
|
- Estelle T. Griswold and C. Lee Buxton v. Connecticut (en)
|
| is dbo:wikiPageDisambiguates
of | |
| is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
| is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |
