An Entity of Type: Supreme Court of the United States case, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia-live.demo.openlinksw.com

1803 landmark U.S. Supreme Court case

Property Value
dbo:description
  • 1803 landmark U.S. Supreme Court case (en)
  • caso emblemático de la Corte Suprema de los Estados Unidos (es)
  • án lệ năm 1803 của Toà án tối cao Hoa Kỳ, xác lập quyền giám sát hiến pháp (vi)
  • rozhodnutí Nejvyššího soudu USA (cs)
  • Leitentscheidung des Obersten Gerichtshofs der Vereinigten Staaten aus dem Jahr 1803 (de)
  • アメリカ合衆国最高裁判所の判決 (ja)
  • 美國最高法院判例 (zh)
dbo:thumbnail
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:align
  • right (en)
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-02-11 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 1803 (xsd:integer)
dbp:caption
  • Thomas Jefferson, who succeeded Adams and believed Marbury's undelivered commission was void. (en)
  • William Marbury, whose commission Madison refused to deliver. (en)
  • James Madison, Jefferson's Secretary of State, who withheld Marbury's commission. (en)
  • President John Adams, who appointed Marbury just before his presidential term ended. (en)
dbp:case
  • Marbury v. Madison, (en)
dbp:cornell
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-02-24 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 1803 (xsd:integer)
dbp:findlaw
dbp:fullname
  • William Marbury v. James Madison, Secretary of State of the United States (en)
dbp:id
  • gov.ntis.AVA02153VNB1 (en)
dbp:image
  • Official Presidential portrait of Thomas Jefferson .jpg (en)
  • James Madison.jpg (en)
  • John Adams A18236.jpg (en)
  • Marbury.jpg (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • Paterson, Chase, Washington (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:lawsapplied
  • U.S. Const. arts. I, III; Judiciary Act of 1789 § 13 (en)
dbp:litigants
  • Marbury v. Madison (en)
dbp:loc
dbp:majority
  • Marshall (en)
dbp:name
  • Marbury v. Madison (en)
dbp:notparticipating
  • Cushing and Moore (en)
dbp:openjurist
dbp:opinion
dbp:outcome
  • Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 is unconstitutional to the extent it purports to enlarge the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court beyond that permitted by the Constitution. Congress cannot pass laws that are contrary to the Constitution, and it is the role of the judiciary to interpret what the Constitution permits. (en)
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 1 (xsd:integer)
dbp:perrow
  • 2 (xsd:integer)
dbp:prior
  • Original action filed in U.S. Supreme Court; order to show cause why writ of mandamus should not issue, December 1801 (en)
dbp:source
  • Judiciary Act of 1789, Section 13 (en)
  • Marbury, 5 U.S. at 158, 160. (en)
  • Marbury, 5 U.S. at 163. (en)
  • Marbury, 5 U.S. at 176–77. (en)
  • Marbury, 5 U.S. at 177. (en)
  • Marbury, 5 U.S. at 178. (en)
  • Marbury, 5 U.S. at 180. (en)
  • U.S. Constitution, Article III, Section 2 . (en)
dbp:text
  • In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make. (en)
  • It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. (en)
  • Thus, the particular phraseology of the Constitution of the United States confirms and strengthens the principle, supposed to be essential to all written Constitutions, that a law repugnant to the Constitution is void, and that courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument. The rule must be discharged. (en)
  • This doctrine ... would declare, that if the legislature shall do what is expressly forbidden, such act, notwithstanding the express prohibition, is in reality effectual. It would be giving to the legislature a practical and real omnipotence, with the same breath which professes to restrict their powers within narrow limits. (en)
  • The [President's] signature is a warrant for affixing the great seal to the commission, and the great seal is only to be affixed to an instrument which is complete. ... The transmission of the commission is a practice directed by convenience, but not by law. It cannot therefore be necessary to constitute the appointment, which must precede it and which is the mere act of the President. (en)
  • The very essence of civil liberty certainly consists in the right of every individual to claim the protection of the laws whenever he receives an injury. (en)
  • And be it further enacted, That the Supreme Court shall have exclusive jurisdiction over all cases of a civil nature where a state is a party ... [and] suits or proceedings against ambassadors, or other public ministers ... The Supreme Court shall also have appellate jurisdiction from the circuit courts and courts of the several states, in the cases herein after specially provided for; and shall have power to issue ... writs of mandamus, in cases warranted by the principles and usages of law, to any courts appointed, or persons holding office, under the authority of the United States. (en)
  • The powers of the legislature are defined and limited; and that those limits may not be mistaken or forgotten, the constitution is written. ... Certainly all those who have framed written constitutions contemplate them as forming the fundamental and paramount law of the nation, and consequently the theory of every such government must be, that an act of the legislature, repugnant to the constitution, is void. (en)
dbp:totalWidth
  • 370 (xsd:integer)
dbp:uspage
  • 137 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 5 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dct:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:label
  • Marbury v. Madison (en)
  • Marbury vs. Madison (cs)
  • Marbury v. Madison (de)
  • Caso Marbury contra Madison (es)
  • Marbury v. Madison (fr)
  • Marbury contro Madison (it)
  • Marbury v. Madison (in)
  • マーベリー対マディソン事件 (ja)
  • Marbury v. Madison (nl)
  • 마베리 대 매디슨 사건 (ko)
  • Caso Marbury v. Madison (pt)
  • Marbury mot Madison (sv)
  • Мэрбэри против Мэдисона (ru)
  • Марбері проти Медісона (uk)
  • 马伯利诉麦迪逊案 (zh)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:depiction
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is dbo:knownFor of
is dbo:wikiPageDisambiguates of
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is rdfs:seeAlso of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International