| dbo:description
|
- 1994 United States Supreme Court case (en)
|
| dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
| dbp:arguedate
|
- 0001-03-30 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:argueyear
| |
| dbp:case
|
- Stansbury v. California, (en)
|
| dbp:concurrence
| |
| dbp:cornell
| |
| dbp:decidedate
|
- 0001-04-26 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:decideyear
| |
| dbp:fullname
|
- Robert Edward Stansbury v. California (en)
|
| dbp:holding
|
- The test for custody under Miranda v. Arizona is whether there was a formal arrest or restraint on freedom of movement of the degree associated with a formal arrest. The subjective views harbored by either the interrogating officers or the person being questioned are irrelevant. The key inquiry should be whether the individual had been placed under formal arrest, or whether the restraint placed on the individual's freedom of movement rose to the level of a formal arrest. (en)
|
| dbp:justia
| |
| dbp:lawsapplied
| |
| dbp:litigants
|
- Robert Edward Stansbury v. California (en)
|
| dbp:loc
| |
| dbp:oralargument
| |
| dbp:oyez
| |
| dbp:parallelcitations
| |
| dbp:percuriam
| |
| dbp:prior
|
- Defendant convicted; Calif. Sup. Ct. affirms (en)
|
| dbp:subsequent
|
- Case remanded to trial court. (en)
|
| dbp:uspage
| |
| dbp:usvol
| |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| dct:subject
| |
| rdf:type
| |
| rdfs:label
|
- Stansbury v. California (en)
|
| owl:sameAs
| |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
| foaf:name
|
- Robert Edward Stansbury v. California (en)
|
| is dbo:wikiPageDisambiguates
of | |
| is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
| is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |