禁止无理搜查扣押的修正案
enmienda de 1791 que prohíbe los registros e incautaciones irrazonables
--Justice Robert H. Jackson in the Opinion of the Court in Johnson v. United States .
December 2023
The effect of the Fourth Amendment is to put the courts of the United States and Federal officials, in the exercise of their power and authority, under limitations and restraints as to the exercise of such power and authority, and to forever secure the people, their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against all unreasonable searches and seizures under the guise of law. This protection reaches all alike, whether accused of crime or not, and the duty of giving to it force and effect is obligatory upon all intrusted under our Federal system with the enforcement of the laws. The tendency of those who execute the criminal laws of the country to obtain conviction by means of unlawful seizures and enforced confessions, the latter often obtained after subjecting accused persons to unwarranted practices destructive of rights secured by the Federal Constitution, should find no sanction in the judgments of the courts, which are charged at all times with the support of the Constitution, and to which people of all conditions have a right to appeal for the maintenance of such fundamental rights.
yes
1791 amendment prohibiting unreasonable searches and seizures
The point of the Fourth Amendment, which often is not grasped by zealous officers, is not that it denies law enforcement the support of the usual inferences which reasonable men draw from evidence. Its protection consists in requiring that those inferences be drawn by a neutral and detached magistrate instead of being judged by the officer engaged in the often competitive enterprise of ferreting out crime. Any assumption that evidence sufficient to support a magistrate's disinterested determination to issue a search warrant will justify the officers in making a search without a warrant would reduce the Amendment to a nullity, and leave the people's homes secure only in the discretion of police officers. Crime, even in the privacy of one's own quarters, is, of course, of grave concern to society, and the law allows such crime to be reached on proper showing. The right of officers to thrust themselves into a home is also a grave concern, not only to the individual, but to a society which chooses to dwell in reasonable security and freedom from surveillance. When the right of privacy must reasonably yield to the right of search is, as a rule, to be decided by a judicial officer, not by a policeman or government enforcement agent.
emendamento della Costituzione statunitense
Bestandteil des Grundrechtekatalogs der Verfassung der Vereinigten Staaten
amendement de la Constitution des États-Unis
right
--Justice William R. Day in the Opinion of the Court in Weeks v. United States .
Поправка 1791, яка забороняє необґрунтовані обшуки та арешти
left
InternetArchiveBot
التعديل الرابع لدستور الولايات المتحدة الأمريكية
Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution
미국 수정 헌법 제4조
4. Zusatzartikel zur Verfassung der Vereinigten Staaten
4. poprawka do Konstytucji Stanów Zjednoczonych
Cuarta Enmienda a la Constitución de los Estados Unidos
Quarta Emenda à Constituição dos Estados Unidos
Четверта поправка до Конституції США
Amendemen Keempat Konstitusi Amerika Serikat
Четвёртая поправка к Конституции США
美國憲法第四修正案
Quarta esmena de la Constitució dels Estats Units
Quatrième amendement de la Constitution des États-Unis