| dbo:description
|
- 2021 United States Supreme Court case (en)
|
| dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
| dbp:arguedate
|
- 0001-04-26 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:argueyear
| |
| dbp:case
|
- Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Bonta, (en)
|
| dbp:concurrence
| |
| dbp:decidedate
|
- 0001-07-01 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:decideyear
| |
| dbp:dissent
| |
| dbp:docket
| |
| dbp:fullname
|
- Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Rob Bonta, Attorney General of California; Thomas More Law Center v. Rob Bonta, Attorney General of California (en)
|
| dbp:googlescholar
| |
| dbp:holding
|
- The requirement for non-profit organizations to disclose their donors under California law is facially invalid because it burdens the First Amendment rights of the donors and it is not also narrowly tailored to an important interest of government. (en)
|
| dbp:joinconcurrence
| |
| dbp:joindissent
| |
| dbp:joinmajority
|
- Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Barrett; Thomas (en)
|
| dbp:joinplurality
| |
| dbp:justia
| |
| dbp:lawsapplied
| |
| dbp:litigants
|
- Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Bonta (en)
|
| dbp:majority
| |
| dbp:oralargument
| |
| dbp:otherSource
| |
| dbp:otherUrl
| |
| dbp:oyez
| |
| dbp:parallelcitations
| |
| dbp:plurality
| |
| dbp:uspage
| |
| dbp:usvol
| |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| dct:subject
| |
| rdf:type
| |
| rdfs:label
|
- Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Bonta (en)
|
| owl:sameAs
| |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
| foaf:name
|
- Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Rob Bonta, Attorney General of California; Thomas More Law Center v. Rob Bonta, Attorney General of California (en)
|
| is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
| is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |