| dbo:description
|
- 1998 U.S. Supreme Court case declaring the line-item veto unconstitutional (en)
|
| dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
| dbp:arguedate
|
- 0001-04-27 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:argueyear
| |
| dbp:case
|
- Clinton v. City of New York, (en)
|
| dbp:concurrence
| |
| dbp:concurrence/dissent
| |
| dbp:courtlistener
| |
| dbp:decidedate
|
- 0001-06-25 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:decideyear
| |
| dbp:dissent
| |
| dbp:findlaw
| |
| dbp:fullname
|
- William J. Clinton, President of the United States, et al. v. City of New York, et al. (en)
|
| dbp:googlescholar
| |
| dbp:holding
|
- The Line Item Veto Act is unconstitutional because the Constitution of the United States of America does not authorize the President of the United States of America to amend federal legislation that has passed both the House of Representatives and the Senate in Congress. Line-item vetoes are unlawful. (en)
|
| dbp:joinconcurrence/dissent
| |
| dbp:joindissent
| |
| dbp:joinmajority
|
- Rehnquist, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, Ginsburg (en)
|
| dbp:justia
| |
| dbp:lawsapplied
|
- U.S. Const. art. I; 2 U.S.C. ยง 691 et seq. (en)
|
| dbp:litigants
|
- Clinton v. City of New York (en)
|
| dbp:loc
| |
| dbp:majority
| |
| dbp:oyez
| |
| dbp:parallelcitations
| |
| dbp:prior
|
- Judgment for plaintiffs, 985 F. Supp. 168 (en)
|
| dbp:uspage
| |
| dbp:usvol
| |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| dct:subject
| |
| rdf:type
| |
| rdfs:label
|
- Clinton v. City of New York (en)
|
| owl:sameAs
| |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
| foaf:name
|
- William J. Clinton, President of the United States, et al. v. City of New York, et al. (en)
|
| is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
| is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |
