| dbo:description
|
- décision de la Cour suprême du Canada (fr)
- Canadian Supreme Court case (en)
|
| dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
| dbp:caseName
|
- Dunsmuir v New Brunswick (en)
|
| dbp:citations
| |
| dbp:concurrence
|
- Binnie J (en)
- Deschamps J (en)
|
| dbp:decidedDate
| |
| dbp:fullCaseName
|
- David Dunsmuir v. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of New Brunswick as represented by Board of Management (en)
|
| dbp:heardDate
| |
| dbp:history
|
- APPEAL from , affirming , quashing a preliminary ruling and quashing in part an award made by an adjudicator. (en)
|
| dbp:joinconcurrence
|
- Charron and Rothstein JJ (en)
|
| dbp:joinmajority
|
- McLachlin CJ, Fish and Abella JJ (en)
|
| dbp:majority
|
- Bastarache and LeBel JJ (en)
|
| dbp:ratio
|
- Correctness and reasonableness should be the only two standards of judicial review with respect to decision-making. The correctness standard will apply with respect of jurisdictional and some other questions of law, and the reasonableness standard is concerned mostly with the existence of justification, transparency, and intelligibility within the decision‑making process and with whether the decision falls within a range of possible acceptable outcomes which are defensible in respect of the facts and the law. If the question is one of fact, discretion, or policy or the legal issue is intertwined with and cannot be readily separated from the factual issue, deference by the court will usually apply automatically with respect to the decision made. (en)
|
| dbp:ruling
| |
| dbp:scc
| |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| dct:subject
| |
| gold:hypernym
| |
| rdfs:label
|
- Dunsmuir v New Brunswick (en)
- Dunsmuir c. Nouveau-Brunswick (fr)
|
| owl:sameAs
| |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
| is dbo:wikiPageDisambiguates
of | |
| is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
| is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |
