An Entity of Type: Thing, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia-live.demo.openlinksw.com

National income inequality

Property Value
dbo:description
  • ahaghị nhata ego mba (ig)
  • desigualdad de ingresos nacionales (es)
  • national income inequality (en)
dbo:thumbnail
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:caption
  • The logarithmic scale shows how wealth has increased for all percentile groups, though moreso for wealthier people. (en)
  • The average personal wealth of people in the top 1% is more than a thousand times that of people in bottom 50%. (en)
  • Relative income growth, organized by percentile classes, normalized to 1970 levels. Graph accounts for both income growth, and the hidden decline in the progressivity of the tax code at the top, the wealthiest earners having seen their effective tax rates steadily fall. (en)
  • A 1916 ad for a vocational school appealed to Americans' belief in the possibility of self-betterment, as well as threatening economic insecurity through lack of education. (en)
  • Same data as adjacent chart, but plotted on logarithmic scale to show absolute dollar amounts. Data shows a range of three orders of magnitude—a ~1000-fold difference. (en)
  • Ivy-Plus university admissions rates vary with the income of the students' parents, with the acceptance rate of the top 0.1% income percentile being almost twice as much as other students. (en)
dbp:date
  • 2014-02-27 (xsd:date)
  • 2014-12-13 (xsd:date)
  • 2019-07-20 (xsd:date)
  • October 2019 (en)
  • October 2023 (en)
dbp:image
  • 1962 (xsd:integer)
  • 1970 (xsd:integer)
  • 20230810 (xsd:integer)
  • Going up or down advertisement.jpg (en)
dbp:quote
  • 1.262304E9 (dbd:second)
  • We haven't achieved the minimalist state that libertarians advocate. What we've achieved is a state too constrained to provide the public goods – investments in infrastructure, technology, and education – that would make for a vibrant economy and too weak to engage in the redistribution that is needed to create a fair society. But we have a state that is still large enough and distorted enough that it can provide a bounty of gifts to the wealthy. (en)
  • If the United States had the same income distribution it had in 1979, the bottom 80 percent of the population would have $1 trillion – or $11,000 per family – more. The top 1 percent would have $1 trillion – or $750,000 – less. (en)
dbp:reason
  • ambiguous sentence: Does Sweden have inequality at 1960 Swedish levels or 1960 US levels, or was it the opposite? (en)
  • on what? (en)
dbp:source
  • – Larry Summers in 2015 (en)
  • —Joseph Stiglitz (en)
dbp:talk
  • Correlation != causation. better refs? (en)
dbp:title
  • Net personal wealth in the U.S. since 1962 (en)
  • Income growth since 1970 (en)
dbp:totalWidth
  • 450 (xsd:integer)
  • 550 (xsd:integer)
dbp:url
dbp:width
  • 340 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dct:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:label
  • Income inequality in the United States (en)
  • تفاوت الدخل في الولايات المتحدة (ar)
  • Desigualdad de ingreso en Estados Unidos (es)
  • Nierówności dochodowe w Stanach Zjednoczonych (pl)
  • Concentração de renda nos Estados Unidos (pt)
rdfs:seeAlso
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:depiction
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is dbo:wikiPageDisambiguates of
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is dbp:causes of
is dbp:subjects of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International