| dbo:description
|
- 2015 United States Supreme Court case (en)
|
| dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
| dbp:arguedate
|
- 0001-03-04 (xsd:gMonthDay)
- 2014-03-25 (xsd:date)
- 2014-05-14 (xsd:date)
|
| dbp:argueyear
| |
| dbp:caption
| |
| dbp:case
| |
| dbp:court
| |
| dbp:date
| |
| dbp:dateDecided
| |
| dbp:decidedate
|
- 0001-06-25 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:decideyear
| |
| dbp:dissent
| |
| dbp:docket
| |
| dbp:fullname
|
- David King, et al., Petitioners v. Sylvia Burwell, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al. (en)
|
| dbp:holding
|
- Section 36B of the ACA provides for subsidies under both federally run and state-run exchanges. The wording "...established by the State" was superfluous when read within "the broader structure of the Act". (en)
|
| dbp:imagesize
| |
| dbp:joindissent
| |
| dbp:joinmajority
|
- Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan (en)
|
| dbp:justia
| |
| dbp:keywords
| |
| dbp:lawsapplied
| |
| dbp:litigants
| |
| dbp:majority
| |
| dbp:name
|
- Halbig v. Burwell (en)
- King v. Burwell (en)
|
| dbp:opinionannouncement
| |
| dbp:opinions
|
- The IRS does not have the statutory power to grant subsidies to Federally-established insurance marketplaces known as exchanges established under the Affordable Care Act, as the enabling legislation defines exchanges as being established by states themselves. Reversed and remanded with instructions to grant summary judgment to the appellants and to vacate the IRS rule, 2–1. Opinion by Judge Griffith, concurrence by Judge Randolph. Judge Edwards dissents. (en)
- The plaintiffs contend that the IRS's interpretation is contrary to the language of the statute, which, they assert, authorizes tax credits only for individuals who purchase insurance on state-run Exchanges. For reasons explained below, we find that the applicable statutory language is ambiguous and subject to multiple interpretations. Applying deference to the IRS's determination, however, we uphold the rule as a permissible exercise of the agency's discretion. (en)
|
| dbp:oralargument
| |
| dbp:otherSource
| |
| dbp:otherUrl
| |
| dbp:oyez
| |
| dbp:parallelcitations
| |
| dbp:prior
|
- 172800.0 (dbd:second)
- 25920.0 (dbd:second)
|
| dbp:priorActions
|
- Summary judgment for government defendants, 2014 WL 129023 (en)
|
| dbp:questionspresented
|
- Whether the Internal Revenue Service may permissibly promulgate regulations to extend tax-credit subsidies to coverage purchased through Exchanges established by the federal government under section 1321 of the ACA. (en)
|
| dbp:reason
|
- This is not PACER. "Amlaw.com" gives no info on who operates the site (en)
- Host is not an official site, no provenance information. If this is linked from a landing page at a reliable source, link that instead (en)
|
| dbp:subsequentActions
|
- Rehearing en banc ordered . (en)
|
| dbp:uspage
| |
| dbp:usvol
| |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| dct:subject
| |
| rdf:type
| |
| rdfs:label
| |
| owl:sameAs
| |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
| foaf:name
|
- David King, et al., Petitioners v.Sylvia Burwell, Secretary ofHealth and Human Services, et al. (en)
|
| is dbo:wikiPageDisambiguates
of | |
| is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
| is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |
