| dbo:description
| |
| dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
| dbp:caseName
|
- Patriation Reference (en)
|
| dbp:chiefJustice
| |
| dbp:citations
| |
| dbp:decidedDate
| |
| dbp:dissent
|
- Constitutional law issue: Martland and Ritchie JJ. (en)
- Constitutional convention issue: Laskin C.J., Estey and McIntyre JJ. (en)
|
| dbp:fullCaseName
|
- Re Resolution to amend the Constitution (en)
|
| dbp:heardDate
|
- 0001-04-30 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:history
|
- On appeal from decisions of the Quebec Court of Appeal, the Manitoba Court of Appeal, and the Newfoundland Court of Appeal (en)
|
| dbp:majority
|
- Constitutional convention issue: Martland, Ritchie, Dickson, Beetz, Chouinard and Lamer JJ. (en)
- Constitutional law issue: Laskin C.J., Dickson, Beetz, Estey, McIntyre, Chouinard and Lamer JJ. (en)
|
| dbp:puisneJustices
| |
| dbp:ratio
|
- Issue 1: A majority of the court held that as a matter of constitutional law, the federal Parliament could unilaterally request that the British Parliament amend the Canadian Constitution, without consent from the provinces. (en)
- Issue 2: A majority of the court held that as a matter of constitutional convention, a substantial degree of provincial consent was required for the amendment of the Canadian Constitution. (en)
|
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| dct:subject
| |
| gold:hypernym
| |
| rdfs:label
|
- Patriation Reference (en)
|
| owl:sameAs
| |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
| is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
| is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |
