| dbp:reason
|
- source fails to reach a clear conclusion, claim goes against other published research: Speed display signs may encourage speeding by those who wish to test it, the source fails to take into consideration those drivers who may use the gamification of the data into the opposite effect (en)
- The technology claims to aid locating the vehicle which is an after-the-fact benefit, not to provide security which is a preventative, before-the-fact, concept (en)
- source has apparent conflict of interest due to financial backing, source presents a hypothetical system, not an actual proven system (en)
- source uses weasel words, source cites a simulation not real world study, source is unable to claim a clear conclusion to the experiment results (en)
|
