| dbo:description
|
- 2013 U.S. Supreme Court case on gay marriage (en)
- affaire de la Cour suprême des États-Unis (fr)
- историческое решение Верховного суде США (ru)
|
| dbo:thumbnail
| |
| dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
| dbp:arguedate
|
- 0001-03-27 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:argueyear
| |
| dbp:case
|
- United States v. Windsor, (en)
|
| dbp:courtlistener
| |
| dbp:date
| |
| dbp:decidedate
|
- 0001-06-26 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:decideyear
| |
| dbp:dissent
|
- Roberts (en)
- Alito (en)
- Scalia (en)
|
| dbp:docket
| |
| dbp:float
| |
| dbp:fullname
|
- United States, Petitioner v. Edith Schlain Windsor, in Her Capacity as Executor of the Estate of Thea Clara Spyer, et al. (en)
|
| dbp:googlescholar
| |
| dbp:holding
|
- Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act, which federally defined marriage as a union between one man and one woman as husband and wife, is unconstitutional under the guarantee of equal protection that is prescribed by the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America. The federal government must recognize same-sex marriages that have been approved by the states as legitimate. Second Circuit affirmed. (en)
|
| dbp:joindissent
|
- Thomas (en)
- Thomas; Roberts (en)
|
| dbp:joinmajority
|
- Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan (en)
|
| dbp:justia
| |
| dbp:lawsapplied
| |
| dbp:litigants
|
- United States v. Windsor (en)
|
| dbp:loc
| |
| dbp:majority
| |
| dbp:opinionannouncement
| |
| dbp:oralargument
| |
| dbp:oyez
| |
| dbp:parallelcitations
| |
| dbp:prior
| |
| dbp:questionspresented
|
- *Does the executive branch's agreement with the lower court that the act is unconstitutional deprive the Supreme Court of jurisdiction to decide the case?
*Does the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the House of Representatives have standing in the case?
*Does the Defense of Marriage Act, which defines the term "marriage" under federal law as a "legal union between one man and one woman" deprive same-sex couples who are legally married under state laws of their Fifth Amendment rights to equal protection under federal law? (en)
|
| dbp:related
|
- * Gill v. OPM and Mass. v. U.S. Dept. of H.H.S
* Golinski v. OPM
* Pedersen v. OPM
* Cardona v. Shinseki (en)
|
| dbp:url
| |
| dbp:uspage
| |
| dbp:usvol
| |
| dbp:video
|
- Interview with Roberta Kaplan on Then Comes Marriage: United States v. Windsor and the Defeat of DOMA, After Words, C-SPAN (en)
|
| dbp:width
| |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| dct:subject
| |
| rdf:type
| |
| rdfs:label
|
- United States v. Windsor (en)
- Caso Estados Unidos contra Windsor (es)
- United States v. Windsor (in)
- Stati Uniti contro Windsor (it)
- Соединённые Штаты против Виндзор (ru)
- 美国诉温莎案 (zh)
|
| owl:sameAs
| |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
| foaf:depiction
| |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
| foaf:name
|
- United States, Petitioner v.Edith Schlain Windsor, in Her Capacity as Executor of the Estate of Thea Clara Spyer, et al. (en)
|
| is dbo:knownFor
of | |
| is dbo:wikiPageDisambiguates
of | |
| is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
| is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
